🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a pending law that include lowering the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavoured tobacco products, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Last month, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be lowered to thirty to fifty percent “following international suggested parameters”, delayed for at least 12 months after the bill passes.

International experts specifically advises a caution must occupy at least 50% of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for multiple violations “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary claims the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but maintains that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that many such provisions operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We reside in a connected world. If I plant tobacco in my property and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my community's youth are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator stated: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Further, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which allow for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, mentioning that young individuals should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, noting that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which includes rising levels of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.