🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart nuclear negotiations with Washington provided that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed fresh requests had come from intermediaries to resume talks with the Trump administration. He said Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is treading a complex route since Iran wishes not to appear to be operating from a position of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient militarily and mentally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Previous Talks Unexpectedly Terminated

The previous five rounds of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that culminated with the American leader claiming the locations had been obliterated. Afterward, European countries used their authority to reinstate international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was decided an local partnership with US participation could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Status

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be revived in various formats if talks reopen.

Trump last week said he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of inactivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Position

In his address to the forum, intended to paint the US as a dominant force that abuses the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict revealed the clash could not be resolved by military means. He stated the assaults began with a US demand for an total Iran submission and concluded with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were mounted with full US knowledge and collaboration, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Remains the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to enforce their demands during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be active and remains the final answer to address disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and fundamentals must be followed."

"In case they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and respect, they will obtain a reply in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this conflict; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He stated: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The facilities and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is important is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but were unable to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become stronger, more cohesive, and more supportive of the leadership and the nation in the aftermath of this invasion."