🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange made a bold forecast – going beyond who would win overall, but block by block. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of votes that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible in which election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump last year backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought it could go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he does so then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. The independent kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. But overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.